Milton’s Ice Harvest of 1906

By Muriel Bristol  (Transcriber) | October 5, 2018

Massachusetts experienced unusually warm weather during the winter of 1906. High temperature records were set that would not be broken for over a century. (There were February days with temperatures ranging as high as 64 degrees). As a result, ice harvests at Massachusetts lakes and ponds fell short of the usual supply.

Some ice dealers looked north to Milton to augment their stacks.

By January 25, the Lynn ice men had given up hopes of securing a crop in the vicinity of that city and began preparations for obtaining their next season’s supplies from New Hampshire. The Lynn Ice Company has houses at Free Pond [Three Ponds?], in Milton, N.H., which will store 20,000 tons. The company has been transporting ice from there to supply its Lynn customers. Z.J. Chase and M.S. Coolidge own land at Milton on which they will build stacks for the ice they may cut there (Cold Storage, February 1906). 

John O. Porter, of the Beverly Ice Company, of Beverly, and Silas Boyes, of the Beverly & Salem Ice Company, went to Milton N.H., last week to arrange for cutting ice. Both of these companies usually get their stocks from Wenham Lake, but the ice at the latter place has not been thick enough for storage. Mr. Boyes’ men have cut some ice 7 inches thick from Wenham Lake, which has been used for present supply. The ice men about Wenham Lake recall the fact that several years ago, when little ice had been obtained there up to the middle of February, a full crop was harvested before the first of April. Mr. Porter is planning to cut from 40,000 to 50,000 tons at Milton, N.H., and will employ 150 men there. He has sent an engine, tools and horses there (Cold Storage, February 1906).

The Beverly Co-operative Ice Company cut some ice nine inches thick last week. The company has been obliged to get ice for present use from Milton N.H. (Cold Storage, March 1906).

The Lynn Ice Company of Z.J. Chase & Son and M.S. Coolidge & Co of Lynn, who cut ice at Milton, N.H., built 11 houses there and had two stacks. No ice was cut by them on ponds near Lynn. They secured 36,000 tons. Their stocks last year aggregated 54,000 tons (Natural Ice, April 1906). 

John O. Porter, of Marblehead, Mass. has filled his ice houses and stacked considerable ice for present use at his ice houses at Milton, N.H. (Cold Storage, April 1906)

Allowing for shrinkage, their stocks will be short about 22,000 tons. Mial W. Chase, of Z.J. Chase & Son, estimates that the ice will cost nearly double what it did last year. The Lynn dealers’ expenses were greatly increased by minor accidents and the high cost of lumber for their houses at Milton. Their work was also much hindered by snow storms. The ice harvested was 16 to 19 inches thick (Natural Ice, June 1906).

George Stackpole, an ice dealer of the Glenmere District of Lynn, fell through a hole in the run at one of the Milton, N.H. ice houses, July 19, and injured his foot so badly that he was obliged to walk with a cane for several days (Cold Storage, August 1906).

The stocks of ice in Lynn are very low. On October 20, M.S. Coolidge disposed of the last of his supply, while the Lynn Ice Company reported bare houses two days before that and the Independent Ice Company gave up selling some days previously. The dealers had been getting ice from Milton, N.H., but the last of that supply was shipped on October 20. Z.J. Chase & Son and G.F. Day & Son were still in evidence at the last report (Cold Storage, November 1906).

The Union Ice Company, of Concord, N.H. is making extensive additions to its plant at Milton, N.H. Over $10,000 are to be expended in the improvements (Cold Storage, November 1906).  

Milton once had a substantial ice industry, of which these accounts represent just an unusual spurt. The John O. Porter mentioned above had a gang of ice cutters working there in 1904 too, with their horse-drawn ice-cutting equipment. Railroad trains, with cars numbering as many as a hundred, shipped ice out of Milton.

Selectman Lucier recalled picking up nails left from where the ice houses, or some of them at least, had once stood at the Town Beach.

References:

Cold Storage and Ice Journal. (1906, February-November). Massachusetts. Retrieved from books.google.com/books?id=SZYKqxiOw1gC

Milton in the War of 1812

By Muriel Bristol | October 5, 2018

Portsmouth newspapers reported the American defeat at the Battle of Bladensburg (Maryland) and the British capture of Washington, D.C. in late August 1814. In the following week, they published further reports of the British capture of Castine and Belfast, Maine, and actions in upstate New York and the American “Northwest.” British naval vessels were cruising off the coast.

Needless to say, Portsmouth’s government and citizens were “Alarmed.” (Portsmouth was also the NH state capitol).

On Saturday, September 3, the Portsmouth town meeting appointed a Committee of Public Safety, as well as adopting a number of other defensive measures. Fortifications on both the Kittery and Portsmouth sides of the harbor were to be put in a state of readiness and additional fortifications constructed by citizen volunteers.

A requisition, for militia, has been made by Gen. [Henry] Dearborn on the Governor of this state, and, we understand, a competent body of the hardy sons of Newhampshire are to be detached, without delay for our defence. A very few days, we trust, will put us into a posture that shall enable us to give a good account of the enemy, should this place receive a visit from him.

His Excellency Gov. Gilman arrived in town yesterday (NH Gazette, September 6, 1814).

NH Governor John Taylor Gilman (1753-1828) put out an urgent call (or “Alarm”) for militia and Milton responded by sending a company of militiamen under Captain William Courson. Captain Courson’s company became a part of the Fourth Regiment, NH Detached Militia, which was commanded by Lt. Colonel Isaac Waldron of Barrington, NH. (Also known as Waldron’s Command).

The muster roll of that company shows the following names, under date Sept. 11, 1814: Capt. William Courson, [2nd] Lieut. Jeremy Nute, Sergt. John Museron [John Meserve], Sergt. Jacob Nute, Sergt. David M. Courson, Corp. Thomas Wentworth; Musician Benjamin Dare [Benaiah Dore], Musician Lewis Hayes. Private soldiers: Ephraim Wentworth, Thomas Baker, Samuel Nute, Daniel Wentworth, John C. Varney, Ichabod Dodge, James Bragdon, Ezekiel Nute, George Dow, Daniel Hayes, Jr., James Twombly, Henry Miller, James Goodwin, William Downs, John Foss, Hapley Varney, Thomas Chapman, Amos Gerrish, Webster Miller, James Varney, Jr., Ebenezer Adams, John L. Varney, William Gerrish, William Foss, William Burroughs, John Remick, Norton Scates, James Hayes, Dowar Dow, Richard Plumer, Ambrose Tuttle, Nathaniel Pinkham, Isaac Hayes, Aaron Twombly, John Mills, William Drew, James Merrow, Jr., Phineas Wentworth, Beard Plumer, Andrew Dow, Dodivah Plumer, John Boise, Sergt. Patrick Hanscomb [Pelatiah Hanscomb], Corp. Joshua Jones, Charles Recker, and Lieut. Hanson Hayes (Scales, 1914).

(The underlined names had appeared also several years earlier as heads of household in the Third (1810) Federal Census of Milton. There would be a tendency for the younger men, the “tick” marks of that census, rather than the older named heads of household to be sent on this adventure).

Major John Anderson (1780-1834) had issued a nationwide notification in late July, regarding the daily rations to be issued in the various military districts. The ration “at any place or place where troops may be stationed, marched, or recruited within the district of Maine or state of Newhampshire and their northern vicinities” was defined:

A ration to consist of one pound and a quarter of beef, eighteen ounces of bread or flour, one gill of rum, whiskey or brandy; and at the rate two quarts of salt, four quarts of vinegar, four pounds of soap, and one pound and a half of candles to every hundred rations (NH Gazette, September 6, 1814).

The rations of salt, vinegar, soap, and candles to be issued to groups of a hundred men were additional company-level rations. A large body of militiamen seems to have encamped outside the town proper at the Portsmouth Plains. Others were detailed to man various fortifications.

DEFENCE. The means of defence have been prosecuted in this [Portsmouth] town and neighborhood for the last fortnight with great assiduity. An attack is expected, and a determination to prepare for it and repel it, universally prevails. Several corps of Militia, Infantry and Artillery, have already arrived from the interior, and others are on their march. The Concord Artillery came in last evening. We are happy to learn that it is the intention of the Commander in Chief to command in person. Volunteers, from this and neighboring towns have offered in great numbers, to labor on the forts; and the works there continue to be daily and rapidly strengthening and improving. Sundry companies of volunteers, composed of those who are exempted from military duty by law [Editor’s note: men aged 45 or over], have already been organized, for the purpose of joining in the defence of the town and harbor (NH Gazette, September 13, 1814).

FEMALE PATRIOTISM. – With pleasure we observe, among other instances of patriotism, and much to the honor of the fair sex, that since the existing alarm a number of LADIES have been voluntarily employed at the State-House in this town, in making cannon and musket cartridges for the use of the militia (NH Gazette, September 13, 1814).

By September 20, the Portsmouth newspapers were reporting a British attack on Baltimore, Maryland, and the capture of the fort at Machais, Maine. They announced also that the troops defending Portsmouth were to be paid $10 per month for their service.

On Saturday last [September 24] the Portsmouth Regiment of Militia were under arms. They marched to the Plains, and in the afternoon were joined by the volunteers and detached militia now at this place. The whole presented a martial scene never before witnessed by our citizens; and their correct manoeuvring drew upon them the praise of numerous spectators (NH Gazette, September 27, 1814).

The expected British attack on Portsmouth never materialized and the militia troops called out to face it were discharged to return home at various times between September 24, 2014 and September 29, 1814.

Captain Courson’s Milton militiamen departed with the others, while he himself remained in the service until November 20, 1814.

Peace negotiations had been going on since August and both parties signed the Treaty of Ghent on December 24, 1814.


Captain William Courson (1782-1863)

William Courson was born in NH in 1782. He died in Fort Plain, NY, January 3. 1863. (He is buried in Fort Plain, NY).

William Courson headed a Milton household at the time of the Third (1810) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 26-44 years, one female aged 26-44 years, one female aged 16-25 years, one male aged under-10 years, and three females aged under-10 years. The census taker recorded his household between those of Paul Jewett and Jona. Young on the one side, and those of Daniel Grant and Peter Grant on the other. Benaiah Dore resided nearby.

Courson’s first wife – his Milton wife – appears to have died sometime between 1820 and 1824. He married (2nd) in Yonkers, NY, September 24, 1824, Elizabeth “Eliza” Kniffen. She was born in Westchester County, NY, in 1800. She died in 1884. (She is buried in Fort Plain, NY).

They were residing in Minden, NY, at the time of the Seventh (1850) Federal Census and the NY State Census of 1855. The two sons and a daughter of his second marriage were living with them. (Other family members appear to have remained in Milton).

Mrs. Eliza Courson, widow of William Courson, filed for a bounty land warrant in 1878, after his death in Fort Plain, NY, January 3, 1863. Her claim was based upon his service as a Captain in the NH Militia between September 11, 1814 and November 20, 1814. She herself died “prior to” January 28, 1885.


References:

Find a Grave. (2018, January 21). William Courson. Retrieved from www.findagrave.com/memorial/186779569

National Archives and Records Administration. (n.d.). Index to the Compiled Military Service Records for the Volunteer Soldiers Who Served During the War of 1812. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration. M602, 234 rolls.

NH Gazette. (1814, September 6). Defence of the Town. Portsmouth, NH: NH Gazette.

NH Gazette. (1814, September 6). Notice Is Hereby Given. Portsmouth, NH: NH Gazette.

NH Gazette. (1814, September 13). Defence. Portsmouth, NH: NH Gazette.

NH Gazette. (1814, September 13). Female Patriotism. Portsmouth, NH: NH Gazette.

NH Gazette. (1814, September 27). Untitled. Portsmouth, NH: NH Gazette.

Scales, John. (1914). History of Strafford County. Retrieved from books.google.com/books?id=nGsjAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA526

Wikipedia. (2018, September 28). Gill (Unit). Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gill_(unit)

Wikipedia. (2018, July 26). Henry Dearborn. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Dearborn

Wikipedia. (2017, November 29). John Taylor Gilman. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Taylor_Gilman

Wikipedia. (2018, September 26). War of 1812. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_1812

A Slip of the Tongue: May Vs. Shall

By S.D. Plissken | October 3, 2018

At last Monday’s meeting of the Board of Selectmen (BOS), Chairman Thibeault made a slip of the tongue regarding the legal force of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) plan.

Chairman Thibeault: Alright. Next on the Agenda, 2019-2024 CIP Discussion. I put this on here. So, the Planning Board has been working on this, along with the department heads, for basically all year and it was approved at the public hearing on September 18. We’ve all received copies of that. Hopefully, we all have had a chance to review it. So, I guess I’ll open it up to any discussion or comments from the board.

Vice-chairwoman Hutchings: Are we voting on it now?

Thibeault: I would recommend that we accept it, but I wasn’t sure if we want to discuss it first. If you want me to go through and highlight some things, I will. Yes, no?

Selectman Lucier: Yep.

Thibeault: Alright. So, the Capital Improvement Program is an annual recommendation report for the Board of Selectmen and the Budget Committee. It is mandated under New Hampshire RSA 674:5 [through 674:]8.

Screech. Stop right there. That is … less than accurate. The BOS is not so mandated. RSA 674:5 states clearly that the BOS may authorize the creation of such a CIP recommendation, which may encompass this or that content. RSAs 674:6 through 674:8 state clearly that, when requested, the Planning Board or CIP committee shall create one in a certain manner and that, having prepared such a recommendation, they shall submit it to those that requested it.

The difference between “may” – things the BOS might do, but only if they like – and “shall” – things the BOS must do, even if they would rather not – is a mile wide.

The BOS may choose to request such a CIP plan or they may choose not to request such a plan. The Planning Board shall submit one to the BOS upon their request. The Planning Board has no choice. At which point, the BOS may choose to use it, in whole or in part. They may equally choose to throw it away, draw pretty pictures on it, or wear its pages as dunce caps. They are not mandated to do any particular thing with it.

Chairman Thibeault likely wants to amend his characterization of a CIP mandate, for accuracy’s sake. The BOS faces no such mandate to either create or implement one – no irresistible force, no unmovable object. The RSAs will not “make” the BOS do whatever it is that he contemplates, they do not escape responsibility for their actions.

Quite the contrary. If that CIP plan proposes yet more tax increases, the BOS has a positive obligation to those it represents to disregard those aspects of it. That would go double if, say, it included things already rejected at the ballot. Otherwise, why have such things on the ballot at all? That would be just silly. (Vice-chairwoman Hutchings sensed this in some inchoate way).

Unless the BOS does not represent the interests of the voters, but some other interest instead. But what could that be?

Aah, the Town government. The interests of the voters and the Town government have diverged. Well, that can happen. One group wants to reverse the trend of many years of increasing taxes and the other wants those increases to continue. It is insatiable, really.

(Chairman Thibeault goes on to say that CIP plan recommends continuing the usual above-inflation-rate tax increase of 3.0% while, elsewhere, in the very same document, the plan recommends also an even-greater-than-usual tax increase of 3.8%).

So, our paths diverge in a wood and the voter’s interests took the one less traveled. And that will make all the difference. (Apologies to Robert Frost).

One hopes we take that less-traveled path. We need a break, a very long break, from above-inflation-rate tax increases. You can not tax your way to prosperity. And the BOS represents us, as opposed to the Town apparatus. Surely, they would never work against our interests? That is why the BOS exists, after all – to represent our interests.

Well, that is the nub of it, isn’t it? I guess, we shall have to wait and see. We have no other choice.

References:

Collins Dictionary. (2018). Nub. Retrieved from www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/nub

Frost, Robert. (1916). The Road Not Taken. Retrieved from www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/44272/the-road-not-taken

Town of Milton. (2018, October 1). BOS Meeting, October 1, 2018. Retrieved from youtu.be/jLkGCxJjXeg?t=332

State of New Hampshire. (1983-2017). RSA Chapter 674: Local Land Use Planning and Regulatory Powers. Retrieved from www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/lxiv/674/674-mrg.htm

Puzzle #6: Mislabeled Boxes

By Muriel Bristol (Transcriber) | October 2, 2018

There are three boxes. One is labeled “Apples,” another is labeled “Oranges,” and the last one is labeled “Apples and Oranges.”

You know that each is labeled incorrectly. You may ask me to pick one fruit from one box, which you choose.

How can you label the boxes correctly?


[Answer to Puzzle #6 to follow in the next Puzzle]


Solution to Puzzle #5: Smith, Jones and Robinson

We are told that Mr. Robinson lives in Leeds. Therefore, Mr. Robinson does not live anywhere else and none of the other passengers live in Leeds.

The guard lives halfway between Leeds and Sheffield. His nearest neighbor is a passenger who earns three times as much as the guard. Mr. Jones can not be the guard’s neighbor, because his salary is not divisible by three. Neither can Mr. Robinson, as we have seen that he lives in Leeds. Therefore, the guard’s neighbor must be Mr. Smith.

It also follows that Mr. Jones must live in Sheffield, that being the only remaining choice. Since, the guard’s namesake is said to live in Sheffield, it follows that the guard’s name is Jones.

Smith is said to have beaten the fireman at billiards. Therefore, Smith is not the fireman. We have seen that Jones is the guard. Therefore, by process of elimination, Smith must be the engine driver.

 

Milton’s First Postmasters (1818-c1840)

By Muriel Bristol | October 1, 2018

Scales’ History of Strafford County states that

Owing to the destruction of the post-office records and papers by fire, it has been found impossible to determine who was the first postmaster in Milton. John Nutter, however, was the first at Milton Mills, and the post-route was from Emery’s Mills [Shapleigh, ME] through Milton Mills to Middleton, and the mail was carried once in two weeks by a Mr. Home.

Local postal records may have been destroyed, but Federal ones were not. They indicate that Simon Chase became the first postmaster of Milton, NH., in 1818. Lewis Hayes became the first Postmaster of Chestnut Hill, i.e., West Milton, in 1821. John Nutter became the first postmaster of Milton Mills, NH, in 1826.

Many of these men were store-keepers in Milton, West Milton, and Milton Mills, respectively. Two of them were doctors. Dedicated post-office buildings would have been rare. The local post-office often occupied a corner of a local store or office.


Milton Post Office

The Postmasters of Milton, NH, from the first postal establishment in 1818 up into 1840 were Simon ChaseJ. Norton Scates, Benjamin Gerrish, James M. Twombly, and Dr. Stephen Drew.

Simon Chase (1818-22)

Simon Chase was born in Berwick, ME, September 30, 1786, son of John and Hannah (Dennett) Chase. He died in Rochester, NH, in 1878. (He is buried in the Rochester Cemetery).

Simon Chase headed a Milton household at the time of the Third (1810) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 16-25 years (himself). The census taker recorded his household between those of Widow Elizabeth Gerrish, Saml. Palmer and Jno. Fisk on the one side, and Nicholas Harford and Gilman Jewett on the other.

He married in Milton, NH, October 28, 1813, Sarah Wingate. She was born in 1794, only child of Enoch and Mary ((Yeaton) (Meserve)) Wingate. She died in Rochester, NH, in 1870. (She is buried in the Rochester Cemetery).

The Post Office Department appointed Simon Chase as Milton’s first Postmaster on March 3, 1818. Prior to his appointment, one assumes that Milton mail came to the Rochester Post Office.

The Milton entries for the Fourth (1820) Federal Census are missing. Simon and Sarah (Wingate) Chase resided in Milton as late as 1823, but had removed to Rochester by 1827.

Simon Chase headed a Rochester household at the time of the Fifth (1830) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 40-49 years (himself), one female aged 40-49 years (Sarah), one female aged 15-19 years, one male aged 5-9 years, one male aged under-5 years, and one female aged under-5 years, and one female aged 60-69 years.

He was engaged in “Commerce” in the Sixth (1840) Federal Census and identified as a merchant in the Seventh (1850) Federal Census. Both in Rochester. While not proof that he kept a store during his Milton years, in which the post office would have operated, it does seem likely.

J. Norton Scates (1822-26)

There appear to have been two John Scates residing in Milton for a time. They do not appear to have been father and son. The younger one (born circa 1790) used the name “J. Norton” or “Norton” to avoid confusion.

A Thomas J. Scates died in Boston, MA, December 21, 1860, aged forty-seven years and three days. His birthplace was given as Milton, NH. By computation, he would have been born there circa December 1813. The parents listed on his Boston death record were Norton (born Milton, NH) and Hannah (born Rochester, NH) Scates.

Norton Scates served in the militia company raised in Milton, NH, in September 1814, for service in Portsmouth, NH, during the War of 1812.

The Post Office Department appointed J. Norton Scates as Milton’s second Postmaster on April 8, 1822.

Norton Scates moved away, probably in 1826, leaving John Scates in possession of the name and Benjamin Gerrish in possession of the postmaster position.

Norton Scates headed a Middleton household at the time of the Fifth (1830) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 40-49 years, one female aged 30-39 years, one male aged 20-29 years, one male aged 10-14 years, one male aged 5-9 years, and one female aged 5-9 years.

Norton Scates headed a Dover household at the time of the Sixth (1840) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 50-59 years (himself), one female aged 30-39 years, and two females aged 15-19 years. One member of his household was engaged in “Agriculture” as opposed to the other two possibilities of Commerce or Industry.

Norton Scates married (3rd) in Rochester, NH, October 29, 1849, Hannah E. Matthes.

Norton Scates kept a grocery store on Main street in Dover between 1859 and 1867. He lived in the rear of the store.

Hannah E. [(Mathes)] Scates later claimed a War of 1812 widow’s pension for Norton Scates’s service in Milton’s militia company.

Benjamin Gerrish (1826-27)

The Post Office Department appointed Benjamin Gerrish as Milton’s third Postmaster on April 16, 1826.

Benj. Gerrish headed a Milton household at the time of the Fifth (1830) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 30-39 years (himself), one female aged 30-39 years, two females aged under-5 years, and one female aged 70-79 years. The census taker recorded his household between those of Steph. M. Matthes and Wm. H. Brewster on the one side and Elizabeth Gerrish (aged 60-69 years) and Thos. Wentworth on the other. (This page, number 11 of 18, presumably contains Milton households).

James M. Twombly (1827-37)

James Twombly served in the militia company raised in Milton, NH, in September 1814, for service in Portsmouth, NH, during the War of 1812.

The Post Office Department appointed James M. Twombly as Milton’s fourth Postmaster on September 18, 1827.

J.M. Twombly, W.B. Wiggin, and H. Meserve were Milton selectmen in 1829.

Jas. Twombly headed a Milton household at the time of the Fifth (1830) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 50-59 years, one female aged 50-59 years, one male aged 15-19 years, and one female aged 10-14 years. The census taker recorded Twombly’s household between those of Jos. Horne and Matthias Nutter on the one side, and Lydia Twombly and Saml. Clemens on the other. (This page, number 1 of 18, presumably contains Milton households).

J.M. Twombly was again a selectman in 1831, 1832, 1833, 1836, 1840, 1841, and 1842.

James M. Twombly headed a Milton household at the time of the Sixth (1840) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 30-39 years (himself), one female aged 30-39 years, one male aged 20-29 years, one male aged 10-14 years, one female aged 10-14 years, one male aged 5-9 years, and one female aged 5-9 years. Two members of his household were engaged in “Commerce,” as opposed to the other two possibilities of Agriculture or Industry. The census taker recorded Twombly’s household between those of Robert Matthes and Benjamin G. Willey on the one side, and Elizabeth Gerrish and James H. Twombly (aged 40-49 years) on the other side.

Dr. Stephen Drew (1837-40)

Stephen Drew was born in Newfield, ME, September 2, 1791, son of Elijah and Abigail (Claridge) Drew. He died in Milton, NH, February 25, 1872.

He married in Milton, NH, October 26, 1817, Harriet Watson. She was born in Milton, NH, April 9, 1795. She died in Evanston, IL, May 7, 1876.

The NH Medical Society certified Dr. Stephen Drew of Milton, NH, in 1818.

State of New Hampshire. This may certify that we the subscribers, Censors of the New Hampshire Medical Society, have examined Dr. Stephen Drew of Milton in said State, a Candidate for the practice of Physic & Surgery, respecting his skill and knowledge therein, and having found him duly qualified therefor, do, in testimony of our approbation, hereunto subscribe our names at Farmington, this 21st day of July Anno Domini 1818. Asa Crosby, Samuel Pray, Censors of the NH Med Society. Attest, Saml Morril Sec’y.

Stephen Drew headed a Milton Household at the time of the Fifth (1830) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 30-39 years (himself), one female aged 30-39 years (Harriet), one male aged 20-29 years, one female aged 15-19 years, two males aged 10-14 years, one female aged 5-9 years, and one female aged under-5 years.

He was one of twelve Milton justices of the peace in 1835. The Post Office Department appointed him Milton Postmaster on June 17, 1837. He had stood as a surety for the previous postmaster, James M. Twombly, back in 1827.

Stephen Drew headed a Milton Household at the time of the Sixth (1840) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 40-49 years (himself), one female aged 40-49 years (Harriet), two males aged 20-29 years, and two females aged 15-19 years. One member of his household was employed in a learned profession or as an engineer. (He was Milton’s town physician).


Chestnut Hill [West Milton] Post Office

The Postmasters of Chestnut Hill (West Milton), NH, from its establishment in 1821 up through most of the 1840s were Lewis Hayes, Israel Nute, and John Hayes.

Lewis Hayes (1821-1828)

Lewis Hayes was born circa 1793-94, son of Daniel and Eunice (Pinkham) Hayes. He died in Kittery, ME, March 31, 1862, aged sixty-eight years and one month. (He is buried in the Hayes Cemetery in Milton, NH).

Lewis Hayes served as a musician, i.e., a fifer or drummer, in the militia company raised in Milton, NH, in September 1814, for service in Portsmouth, NH, during the War of 1812.

He married in Wolfeboro, NH, August 17, 1820, Sarah Moody Clark, he of Milton and she of Wolfeboro. The Rev. Isaac Townsend officiated at the ceremony. She was born in Wolfeboro, NH, March 23, 1800, daughter of Joseph and Comfort Clark. She died in Kittery, ME, May 12, 1883.

The Post Office Department appointed Lewis Hayes as the first Chestnut Hill [West Milton] Postmaster on March 17, 1821.

Lewis Hayes headed a Milton household at the time of the Fifth (1830) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 30-39 years (himself), one female aged 20-29 years (Sarah), two males aged 5-9 years, one male aged under-5 years, and one female aged under-5 years. The census taker recorded his household between those of Thos. P. Ricker and Danl. Hayes on the one side and Calvin P. Horne and Chas. Horne on the other.

He moved from Milton, first to South Berwick, ME, before 1835, and then on to Kittery, ME, by 1840.

Lewis Hayes headed a Kittery household at the time of the Sixth (1840) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 40-49 years (himself), one female aged 40-49 years (Sarah), one male aged 15-19 years, one male aged 10-14 years, one female aged 10-14 years, one male aged 5-9 years, and one male aged under-5 years. One member of his household was engaged in “Commerce,” as opposed to the other two possibilities of Agriculture or Industry.

Israel Nute (1828-1836)

Israel Nute was born in Milton, NH, circa 1791-92, son of Jotham and Sarah (Twombly) Nute. He died in Milton, NH, February 15, 1836.

He married in the First Congregational Church in Rochester, NH, September 22, 1817, Hannah Fish. She was born in Milton, NH, September 3, 1797, daughter of John and Rebecca (Ober) Fish. She died in Lincoln, ME, September 24, 1874.

The Post Office Department appointed Israel Nute as the second Chestnut Hill [West Milton] Postmaster on August 3, 1828. Jotham Nute and David Nute stood surety for him.

Israel Nute headed a Milton household at the time of the Fifth (1830) Federal Census. His household included one male 20-29 years (himself), one female aged 30-39 years (Hannah), one male aged 15-19 years, one male aged 10-14 years, one male 5-9 years, one female aged 5-9 years, one male aged under-5 years, and one female aged 60-69 years. The census taker recorded his household between those of Mary Wingate [widow of Enoch Wingate] and William Matthes on the one side, and Thos. P. Ricker and Danl. Hayes on the other.

Israel Nute was one of twelve Milton justices of the peace in 1835.

Both Israel Nute and his father, Jotham Nute, died in February 1836. Jotham Nute’s widow received a pension in Portsmouth, NH, for his Revolutionary war service, beginning in September 1836. Israel Nute’s widow moved to Lincoln, ME, before 1840, where she married (2nd), April 28, 1844, Dr. Samuel Forbes.

John Hayes (1836-1847)

John Hayes was born in Milton, NH, circa July 1802, son of Ezekiel and Mehitabel (Gale) Hayes. He died in Milton, NH, May 27, 1847, aged forty-four years, 10 months. (He is buried in the Hayes Cemetery in Milton, NH).

He married January 13, 1825, Sarah Wingate. She was born in Farmington, NH, December 19, 1803, daughter of John and Mary (Cate) Wingate. She died in Rochester, NH, in July 1863.

John Hayes headed a Milton household at the time of the Fifth (1830) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 20-29 years (himself), one female aged 20-29 years, one male aged 5-9 years, one male aged under-5 years, and one female aged 5-9 years. The census taker recorded his household between those of Joshua Ray and Ezekiel Hayes on the one side, and Danl. Hayes, Jr., and Beniah Dore on the other.

The Post Office Department appointed John Hayes as the third Chestnut Hill [West Milton] Postmaster on March 19, 1836.

John Hayes headed a Milton household at the time of the Sixth (1840) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 30-39 years (himself), one female aged 30-39 years, one female aged 20-29 years, one male aged 10-14 years, one female aged 10-14 years, one male aged under-5 years, and one female aged under-5 years. The census taker recorded his household between those of Jacob Nute and Hiram Ricker on the one side, and Danl. Hayes, Jr., and Eliphalet F. How on the other. Three members of his household were engaged in “Agriculture,” as opposed to the other two possibilities of Commerce or Industry.


Milton Mills Post Office

The Postmasters of Milton Mills, NH, from its establishment in 1826 up into 1840 were John Nutter and John L. Swinerton.

As mentioned above, a Mr. Homes brought the Milton Mills mail over from Emery’s Mill in Shapleigh, ME, on his way to Middleton, NH. He made the trip every two weeks.

John Nutter (1826-1838, 1841-42)

John Nutter was born circa 1780-89.

John Nutter held the office of Town Moderator for a single year around 1825-26.

The Post Office Department appointed John Nutter as the first Milton Mills Postmaster on November 13, 1826. He held that office from then through March 1837. Dr. John L. Swinerton succeeded him, although he appears to have returned briefly in 1841-42.

John Nutter, T.C. Lyman, and Charles Swasey were selectmen in 1830. He was one of twelve Milton justices of the peace in 1835.

John Nutter headed a Milton household at the time of the Fifth (1830) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 40-49 years (himself), one female aged 30-39 years, and one male aged 15-19 years. The census taker recorded Nutter’s household between those of Eben. Osgood and Mehitable Swasey on the one side, and Lydia Twombly and Obadiah Witham on the other. (This page, number 15 of 18, presumably contains Milton Mills households, as he was the Milton Mills postmaster).

John Nutter headed a Milton household at the time of the Sixth (1840) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 50-59 years, one female aged 50-59 years, and one female aged 20-29 years. One member of his household was engaged in “Agriculture,” as opposed to the other two possibilities of Commerce or Industry. The census taker recorded his household between Charles Swasey and Gilman Jewett on the one side and Samuel L. Hart and Ezekiel Merrow on the other.

Dr. John L. Swinerton (1838-41, 1842-43)

John Langdon Swinerton was born in Newfields, ME, June 23, 1805, son of John and Lydia (Dunnell) Swinerton. He died in Wakefield, NH, November 2, 1882, aged seventy-seven years.

He married in Wolfeboro, NH, June 25, 1832, Ann A. Robinson. She was born in Vermont in 1803. She died September 11, 1880.

John L. Swinerton was one of twelve Milton justices of the peace in 1835. The Post Office Department appointed John Swinerton as the second Milton Mills Postmaster on December 13, 1838.

He attended medical classes or lectures at Bowdoin College between February and May 1839.

John L. Swinerton headed a Milton Household at the time of the Sixth (1840) Federal Census. His household included one male aged 30-39 years (himself), one female aged 30-39 years (Ann A.), one males aged 5-99 years, and one female aged under-5 years. One member of his household was employed in a learned profession or as an engineer [physician in 1850]. The census taker recorded his household between those of Bray Sims [trader] and Asa Fox [trader] on the one side, and Alpheus Goodwin [tanner] and Ebenezer Osgood [blacksmith] on the other.

The Post Office Department appointed John Swinerton again as Milton Mills Postmaster on December 15, 1842.

He was living in Milton as late as the Eighth (1860) Federal Census, but he was John L. Swinerton of Union when he paid an annual $1 US Excise tax on his physician’s license in May 1864.

(See Milton Mills’ Dr. John L. Swinerton (1805-1882) for a more complete sketch of Dr. Swinerton).


Federal Registers of 1828, 1833, and 1835

Postmasters were listed also in the official Federal registers of its principal officers and officials. Below are excerpted the entries for Milton and Milton Mills in 1828, 1833, and 1835.

In the register for the year ending June 30, 1828:

Office. County. State. Postmasters. Distance from Washington, State Cap.

Milton, Strafford, N.H. James M. Twombly. 525, 58.

Milton Mills, Strafford, N.H. John Nutter. 549, 44 [Page 74].

For the year ending September 30, 1833:

Persons employed in the General Post Office, with the annual compensation of each.

Chestnut Hill, N.H. Israel Nute. $2.09;

Milton, N.H. James M. Twombly. $9.69;

Milton Mills, N.H. John Nutter, $5.07 [Page 134].

For the year ending September 30, 1835:

Persons employed in the General Post Office, with the annual compensation of each.

Chestnut Hill, N.H. Israel Nute. $1.83;

Milton, N.H. J.M. Twombly. $10.90;

Milton Mills, N.H. John Nutter. $7.51 [Page 20].

Twombly and Nutter held their sinecures during the presidencies of Democratic-Republican President John Quincy Adams (1825-29) and his successors, Democratic presidents Andrew Jackson (1829-37) and Martin Van Buren (1837-41). Postmasters were political appointees in this period. There is a strong likelihood that these men held their offices by virtue of being Democrats. There was a turnover in these offices when Whig presidents William Henry Harrison (1841-41) and John Tyler (1841-45) took office.

Postmasters in New-Hampshire, 1835

Milton, James M. Twombly, (Chestnut Hill,) Israel Nute, (Mills,) John Nutter.

References:

Bowdoin College. (1839). Catalogue of the Officers and Student of Bowdoin College and the Medical School of Maine. Retrieved from books.google.com/books?id=kXbOAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA11

Doubleday, Anne. (n.d.). Doubleday Postal History. Retrieved from www.doubledaypostalhistory.com/postmaster/NewHampshire/Strafford.pdf

Farmer, John. (1835). The New Hampshire Annual Register and United States Calendar, 1835. Retrieved from books.google.com/books?id=lugWAAAAYAAJ

Find a Grave. (2016, September 13). John Hayes. Retrieved from www.findagrave.com/memorial/169877327

Find a Grave. (2016, September 13). Lewis Hayes. Retrieved fromwww.findagrave.com/memorial/169872967

Find a Grave. (2012, June 18). Simon Chase. Retrieved from www.findagrave.com/memorial/92136668/simon-chase

NH Medical Society. (1911). Records of the New Hampshire Medical Society from Its Organization in 1791 to the Year 1854. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=sadXAAAAMAAJ

Scales, John. (1914). History of Strafford County, New Hampshire, and Representative Citizens. Retrieved from books.google.com/books?id=nGsjAQAAMAAJ

US Post-Master General. (1828, June 1). List of Post-Offices in the United States, with the Names of the Post-Masters, of the Counties and States, to which They Belong; the Distances from the City of Washington, and the Seats of State Capitals, Respectively; Exhibiting the State of Post-Offices, on the 1st of June, 1828. Retrieved from books.google.com/books?id=4iHiqHCs4ksC

US Department of State. (1833, September 30). Register of All Officers and Agents, Civil, Military, and Naval, in the Service of the United States, on the Thirtieth September 1833. Retrieved from books.google.com/books?id=7B5AAAAAYAAJ

US Department of State. (1835, September 30). Register of All Officers and Agents, Civil, Military, and Naval, in the Service of the United States, on the Thirtieth September 1835. Retrieved from books.google.com/books?id=Tx9AAAAAYAAJ

Milton’s Dr. Drew (1791-1872)

By Muriel Bristol (Transcriber) | September 30, 2018

I came across the following obituary while doing some Post Office research. Dr. Stephen Drew practiced as Milton’s physician for over fifty years. (He was for a brief time also Postmaster of the Milton Post Office).

OBITUARY OF DR STEPHEN DREW

BY DR HALEY OF MILTON

Dr. Stephen Drew studied medicine with Dr. Ayer of Newfield, Me., attended medical lectures at Harvard University and at other medical colleges, and received his diploma in medicine about the year 1815. He first practiced his profession for more than a year at Conway, in this State, thence he removed to Milton, N.H., where he faithfully and zealously followed his profession until about four years ago, when his strong and almost invincible frame began to yield to the relentless ravages of age and disease. He was in active practice, in this and adjoining towns, fifty-three years. Indeed, he did not entirely cease office practice until a little before his death, March 1872, so we may as well say fifty-seven years in all.

He came to Milton at the same time that Dr. James Farrington went to Rochester. Dr. Pray was also at Rochester, Dr. Hammond at Farmington and Dr. Russell at Wakefield. These fathers in medicine have all passed away most of them long ago. Had Dr. Drew lived until April, 1872, he would have been eighty one years of age. He lived to see his own generation almost all pass away, another enter upon and pass well across the stage of action, and a third generation appear and pass through infancy and childhood into youth and early manhood. 

The Milton of fifty-six years ago was very different from the Milton of to-day. Says a reliable informant: “At that early period the large tract of country over which his visits extended was a wilderness in comparison with to-day. Very few good roads, but many bridle paths, making it necessary for him to perform much of his labor on horseback, subjecting him to much inconvenience and exposure.”

He was eminent as a surgeon, preeminent as a practitioner of medicine. He was honored by his peers and revered by his younger brethren. In many respects, he was a model physician. In a word he was a physician. He brought to his profession a life-long enthusiasm, which kept him, to last, well in the advance of medical knowledge. His extensive experience, keen observation and quick reason him to anticipate many an advance in medical practice. He was studious, energetic, laborious, unwearying.

In the “sick room” he was calm and self-possessed. No ordinary or extraordinary danger or unlooked-for emergency could throw him off his guard. To the full extent of knowledge, resources and skill, he was able to do all [that] could be done for his patients. The results of all his experience, the accumulations of his extensive research, hastened in orderly array to his aid.

Then, too, he was wisely deliberate in his opinions actions, never hasty, inconsiderate or rash. And being prudently cautious in his determinations, he had great firmness in carrying them out. Yet he was liberal in his treatment of those who differed from him. He was willing candidly to weigh the reasons for modes of practice other than his own; and as he sought new light he was ready to welcome it from whatever source.

Another grand qualification in a physician, he was thoroughly trustworthy. The secrets of his patients and of their families, whether directly or indirectly communicated to him, were inviolably safe in his keeping. His own family never knew anything of the secret history of his patients. A wise head, an attentive ear, a sharp and open eye, but a silent tongue.

He was an old-time gentleman, a gentleman through and through, a man of culture in mind and heart and manners, a man whose manhood could not long be concealed.

He was benevolent, that basis quality of character, out of which all true politeness springs, and from which it gets its strength. He was the poor man’s friend, the poor man’s willing servant. He served as faithfully in the abode of poverty as in the mansion of wealth.

He was indeed “the beloved physician.” Into hundreds, thousands of families has he repeatedly entered as a messenger of hope and help. Thousands of lives, by the blessing of God, has he been the means of prolonging. Thousands have been comforted by him in hours of bitter pain and sorrow, or conducted by him through imminent peril. Yea, until this generation, and the generation after, shall all have passed away, he will continue to be in the remembrances and traditions of multitudes, “the beloved PHYSICIAN.”

In his last years he came fully into the light and life of Christ. The very day before his death he spent largely with his Bible and book of prayer. God was preparing him for his speedy exit from the scenes of this life and entrance into the glories of the life everlasting?


See also Milton’s Dr. Stephen Drew (1791-1872).


References:

NH Medical Society. (1873). Transactions of the New Hampshire Medical Society. Retrieved from books.google.com/books?id=SO8hZwj45UsC&pg=PA115

Multi-Millionaire Says “Enough”

By S.D. Plissken | September 29, 2018

A commenter sent me a newspaper article from the Laconia Daily Sun of September 28. It takes place in Alton, but makes several points that are pertinent here as well.

It concerns a multi-millionaire who is trying to sell his 19-acre waterfront estate. He put the property on the market for $49 million dollars four years ago (2014). He halved the price two years ago (2016) to $25 million. It is currently assessed for tax purposes at $23,109,500. (As if you can actually rate it to the nearest $500, when dealing with these numbers). It is currently offered at $17.8 million.

Note that the estate is not “moving.” In economic terms, the market did not “clear” at the $49 million, $25 million, $23 million, nor yet at the $17.8 million prices. Multi-millionaires and tax assessors can have their fantasies but the market determines the price and they do not. Of course, sufficient sales data must be somewhat difficult to obtain for 19-acre multi-million dollar waterfront estates.

Bahre paid $309,280.17 in property taxes! I know, this guy is a selectman’s dream. This summer, Alton reduced his valuation by $936,400 and refunded $12,092 in taxes from the 2017 year.

Bahre is suing the Town of Alton, because their valuation is still $5,355,811 higher than the asking price at which the property does not “clear.”

The article notes parenthetically that

At $14.98, Alton has one of the lowest tax rates among communities with extensive waterfront on Lake Winnipesaukee. Moultonborough’s rate is considerably lower, at $8.22 per $1,000 of assessed value. But Wolfeboro, Meredith, Gilford, and Laconia are higher, with tax rates of $14.98, $15.23, $17.26 and $21.03 respectively.

Now, from my relative hovel in Milton, any one of those “higher” rates seems vastly better than our $25.89. We began below the high end of this “higher” rate list eleven years ago, and rose, and rose, and rose, peaking at $28.60 in 2015 and $28.40 in 2016. Then BOS Chairman Rawson was asked last year what rate would finally be “too high.” He said $30, $30 per thousand would be too high. (“Miss me yet?”)

Only the phantasmagorical flash valuation of last year allowed the Milton selectmen to “cut” us to $25.89. Well, yes, there was not much pain in it for them. Fantastically high valuations combined with a slight cut in rate produced a fantastically higher bottom line still. (And they did not even get it right).

This Alton multi-millionaire guy can probably afford to sue the Town of Alton into the ground, so this will be interesting to watch. And the premise of his suit is itself interesting. The Town’s high tax rate – yes, he means the $14.98 – is scaring off potential buyers. He cannot realize the full value of his property because of high taxes.

Fascinating as all of that is, the real nugget was buried near the bottom of the article:

The suit filed by attorney Margaret Nelson on behalf of the Bahres, argues, “Even affluent potential purchasers are concerned about the very high tax burden, especially in light of recent changes in the federal tax law regarding the deductibility of property tax expenses.”

Beginning with this federal Income Tax year, taxpayers will only be able to deduct $10,000 in state and local taxes from their income tax.

Yes, you read it right. If a business bears a tax burden that is greater than the deductible $10,000, the portion above that amount is no longer deductible from Federal taxes. Remember, they pay a local NH State Business Tax too.

The Feds just stopped subsidizing places with high local taxes. For a valuable property, having it in Milton, or California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, etc. – all high tax places – just became even more expensive than last year.

What effect might that have on businesses? Would taxes even higher-than-high tend to make Milton more attractive to them or less?

You figure it out.

References:

Laconia Daily Sun. (2018, September 27). Bahre sues Alton, alleging taxes on lakefront estate scaring away buyers. Retrieved from www.laconiadailysun.com/news/local/bahre-sues-alton-alleging-taxes-on-lakefront-estate-scaring-away/article_7132b470-c0eb-11e8-ac87-472a3856d0fc.html

 

Non-Public BOS Session Scheduled (October 1, 2018)

By Muriel Bristol | September 29, 2018

The Milton Board of Selectmen (BOS) have posted their agenda for a BOS meeting to be held Monday, October 1.

The meeting is scheduled to begin with a Non-Public preliminary session at 5:00 PM. That agenda has two Non-Public items classed as 91-A:3 II (a) and 91-A:3 II (c).

91-A:3 II (a). The dismissal, promotion, or compensation of any public employee or the disciplining of such employee, or the investigation of any charges against him or her, unless the employee affected (1) has a right to a meeting and (2) requests that the meeting be open, in which case the request shall be granted.

The first matter (the “a” item) suggests that some Town employee is getting either a kick in the pants, a pat on the back, or a kiss in the mail.

91-A:3 II (c). Matters which, if discussed in public, would likely affect adversely the reputation of any person, other than a member of the public body itself, unless such person requests an open meeting. This exemption shall extend to any application for assistance or tax abatement or waiver of a fee, fine, or other levy, if based on inability to pay or poverty of the applicant.

The second matter (the “c” item) might relate again to the recent tax abatement process. Although one would think they would have worked their way through those by now. It might by now be one of the other reasons cited in by the code.


The BOS intend to adjourn their Non-Public BOS session at approximately (*) 6:00 PM, when they intend to return to Public session.

The Public portion of the agenda has new business, old business, the next wave of departmental budget presentations, and the approval of minutes.

Under new business is scheduled: 1) Town Planner Contract Acceptance (Heather Thibodeau), 2) 2019-2024 CIP Discussion (Ryan Thibeault), and 3) Conservation Commission Non-Voting Member Position Discussion.

The CIP (Capital Improvement Plan) is the method by which the departments fast-track their “capital” expenses past the ballot. By definition, government has no capital. No one invests in it. It has no income apart from what it levies in taxes and fees. Government is a consumer and its inventory consists of consumption goods purchased with tax money. For that reason, some have termed this the Tax Acceleration Plan (TAP) instead.

Under old business is scheduled: 4) Downtown Parking Discussion Follow up (Rich Krauss), 5) Townhouse Heating/Cooling Discussion Follow up (Erin Hutchings), 6) Recreation Revenue and Office Discussion (Ryan Thibeault), and 7) Selectmen Discussion of Budget Presentations from 9.24.18

Chief Krauss returns to speak again on downtown parking issues. Winter is coming. Townhouse heating problems appear for the fifth time.

Chairman Thibeault will speak on Recreation Revenue. In prior meetings, the BOS was unable to distinguish between beach admittance money and boat ramp money. The Recreation Office discussion likely proceeds from Selectman Lucier’s expressed desire to shut down the Beach’s satellite office for the winter.

The BOS will discuss the prior (September 24) meeting’s annual departmental budget submissions. That bears watching. The prior meeting’s installment of departmental budget submissions included Economic Development, Budget Committee, Fire, Emergency Management, Library, Welfare, Town Clerk/Tax Collector, and Outside Appropriations. (Not in that order).

This meeting’s installment of departmental budget submissions includes (time permitting): Planning & Code Enforcement, Planning Board, Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA), Conservation, Town Administration, Government Buildings, Solid Waste, Highway, and Debt Services.


Mr. S.D. Plissken contributed to this article.


References:

State of New Hampshire. (2016, June 21). RSA Chapter 91-A. Access to Governmental Records and Meetings. Retrieved from www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/91-A/91-A-3.htm

Town of Milton. (2018, September 28). BOS Meeting Agenda, October 1, 2018. Retrieved from www.miltonnh-us.com/uploads/bos_agendas_831_676618924.pdf

ZBA Meeting and Some Anecdotes

By S.D. Plissken | September 28, 2018

Last night, the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) approved the variance for the Binker Brothers (Chris and Michelle Penta) to use their own Grange property in a commercially-zoned part of Milton Mills as a retail antique shop. The vote was unanimous.

Hurray! But it is not over. The ZBA mentioned several times that there was a follow-on stage in which the Planning Committee, the DPW, and the Police would have to approve also. The Police were to decide if the presence of three or four cars would obstruct visibility.

And if someone appeals in the next thirty days, the whole process can begin again.

There you find one of the thorny knots that obstruct businesses in Milton. All of these boards and committees are overlapping, interlocked, referenced, and cross-referenced, working from manuals originally copy-and-pasted from State exemplars and then “tweaked” over the years to make them even worse. And therein lies a problem.

My late grandfather worked all his life as a tool and die maker for the General Electric Company (GE). I often helped him do various household projects in his retirement years – painting the house, repairing the roof, building a wall, etc. He had a sort of joke that he would make when he had considered some way or means of accomplishing our objective and then rejected it. He would invariably say, “We’ll send that to Planning.” At the GE, that was what they always said when they tabled things, usually forever. Planning was where ideas went to die.

I have an acquaintance who grew up in Massachusetts. (He escaped). That acquaintance told me a story of how they think there. In the police section of his hometown’s annual Town Report, every year, the Police Chief would document with impressive charts and graphs the particular intersection that had experienced the most accidents in that year. Now, this was never “Death on the Highway.” You could count the  minor fender-bender accidents on one hand. And the solution to this grave problem? They would put up a traffic streetlight in that intersection.

Can you guess what happens next? In the next year, another intersection would move to the fore as being now the one that had the most fender-benders. And the solution to that new problem was to put up another traffic streetlight. And so on, through all the years, until nearly every intersection in town had a traffic streetlight. You may well imagine that there were still minor fender-benders, maybe even more than before, but they had created also a new traffic congestion problem.

When all you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail. My friend heard recently that the proposed solution to the manufactured traffic congestion was to make all the major streets in town into one-way streets. (Rochester went this way). The townspeople finally rebelled and said “no.”

We may note that reversing the original failed idea is never seriously considered. When some ill-advised government notion fails, some additional complication, or some further intervention, is always the “fix” instead.

I employed a contractor last winter for a household project. He reminded me that “all of the towns around here” had created their various boards and committees at just about the same time – the late 1970s and early 1980s. (One might even suspect they all got their bad advice from a single source). He said that “the general idea was to make sure that nothing ever changed.”

I will take that with a grain of salt, but it is true that the net effect of a passel of committees with overlapping and competing authorities is to impede change. That is how Hitler managed his satraps – he set them all against each other with overlapping authorities. Only he could “resolve” the bureaucratic differences that inevitably arose. Stalin was the same. That is the way authoritarians think.

Everyone seems to think that the Milton town government needs to “encourage” businesses. I do not know from where this bad idea comes. (Maybe the same source as the committees). It is obviously wrong, but is also obviously widely held.

But, putting that aside for a moment, if you really want to “encourage” businesses, I mean, if it is really more than just lip service, why not separate the overlaps of these committees? (Use an axe). Does the ZBA really need to reference the DPW, the Police, and Planning as the next stage for a simple variance?

I am certain – absolutely certain – that a typical Grange meeting took up more parking space – with horses and buggies – than the Binker Brothers will ever have at any one time as antiques customers. And horses are generally taller than cars. Did the Police of that time have to pass on “visibility” before the construction of the Grange hall could proceed? Of course not, they would have regarded that as absurd and tyrannical.

Or go the other way. Combine the committees that have overlapping authority into fewer committees. The Planning and Zoning were originally one entity. Right now, you are just stuck in a bureaucratic morass. “Less is more.”

Get out of the way. And reduce taxes. Do that first. Then do it again. Lather, rinse, repeat. That would be the most “encouraging” thing that could be done. Who knows which of the fine home businesses on the Milton Made Products Site might blossom into something bigger and better if the ever-increasing demands of the town apparatus were not sapping their strength?


By the way, when one is going through a list of standards, each one of them is a criterion. Criteria is the plural. This is similar to data (plural) and datum (singular).

Facts, Rumors, and Rumors about Facts

By S.D. Plissken | September 27, 2018

Just rumors. Really, rumors? Or are they just facts that you don’t like?

Closing of China Pond

On Tuesday, September 25, 2018, a sympathetic resident posted on local social media (Our Milton Home Facebook Group) that “China Pond is closing forever! I am devastated!!!!” When asked about this, the resident replied,

No. She [i.e., one of the owners] told me they couldn’t get the proper [State] permits [for Ray’s Marina]. Their lease [on China Pond] is up on October 7th and they’re gonna take a break and spend quality time with their children.

This seems pretty straightforward. The resident poster spoke with one of the owners and then reported what they had said.

It is not the State’s fault that the Cumberland Farms landlord raised the rent on the China Pond tenant. The State only is to blame for years of permitting issues having to do with parking at the hoped-for Ray’s Marina complex restaurant.

Cumberland Farms is not to blame for raising the rent on China Pond at the expiration of the lease. The Town of Milton is responsible for that. What did you suppose would happen when taxes are increased at double the rate of inflation for over a decade?

The Town of Milton imposed exorbitant taxes on Cumberland Farms (and all the rest of us); Cumberland Farms simply passed that increase on to China Pond at its earliest opportunity – the expiration of the lease. That is the way of the world and completely to be expected. In effect, the Town of Milton raised China Pond’s rent. And yours, and mine.

By the way, one of our commenters says that the Board of Selectmen (BOS) knew about the China Pond closing a couple of weeks ago. Selectman Lucier mentioned it in a BOS Meeting. At present, that is just a rumor, although one capable of being checked. (Editor’s Note: This has since been verified. Selectman Lucier announced the China Pond closing in the BOS Meeting of September 10, 2018).

Ray’s Marina

Ray’s Marina closed in 2002 after fifty years in business. According to the Town’s online assessing database – Avitar – the property was sold to Ocean Management Group for $742,000 on August 13, 2007. Those would be the people that had RVs displayed there for sale for some years before the recession. The businesses that suffer most in a recession are those that sell “optional” products, such as RVs. Did the Town “encourage” them in any way? No, it continued to raise their taxes, despite the recession. TD Bank called in their mortgage on May 30, 2013.

The current owners bought the property for $180,000 as Gold River, LLC, on August 21, 2015. (Note the $570,000 drop in price from the foreclosed bubble price of $750,000 to the reality price of $180,000). Gold River has presumably been paying Milton’s ever-increasing taxes on that amount for three years now. It is currently assessed at an increased value of $189,900.

By calculation, that would be about $4,916 in taxes this year, about $5,370 last year, and about $5,140 the year before. Gold River will have paid a three-year total of about $15,246 in taxes on a non-performing property. That is to say, nothing at all came in the door and $15,246 went out the door. They have paid already something like 8.6% of the purchase price in taxes alone, while seeking State approvals.

The costs are a fact. Ask yourself, if this were you, how long could you keep paying that much for a non-performing property? Not long, that is a fact too.

Binker Brothers Antique Store

On August 3, Mr. Elder posted regarding Chris and Michelle Penta’s purchase of the old Grange building for their Binker Brothers’ Antiques business. He congratulated them on their commitment to remaining in Milton Mills. The Pentas posted on August 9 that they had begun renovations and were seeking information about contractors. Chris Penta sought to get rid of old appliances on August 14.

But there was a dark cloud on the horizon, a Town of Milton-shaped cloud. Michelle Penta posted on September 2:

Starting a business has many necessary steps. Apparently our town has one additional step that doesn’t exist in other communities. It is a step that delays opening/generating income by AT LEAST 30 days. This has been a roller coaster ride with many ups and downs. Receiving all the encouraging words and support from other residents gives us the motivation to keep on going. Maybe together we can work towards changing the process to be more user friendly, for the next person who wants to create something great in our town.

This would appear to be referring to a particular definitional twist. The property is zoned “commercial,” which you might think would include a little antique shop. No, that is a “retail” use. I suppose the Pentas can open all the shoe factories that they want, such as used to exist in Milton Mills, but not a retail antique business. Unless they get a variance. Really?

Michelle Penta posted again yesterday:

Chris Penta and I have been diligently preparing and the time is here! We are going before the zoning board to seek approval to open an antique store in Milton Mills on Thursday 9/27 at 6pm. Endorsement from residents is powerful! This is a public hearing. Anyone can attend and speak. If you want to see a fabulous store that supports local artists and sells ridiculously cool stuff, please show up on Thursday! We are super excited, hopeful yet nervous! The zoning board approval is critical! Your presence would be greatly appreciated!!!

So, I do not see that anything said yesterday was only a “rumor.” It seems pretty fact-based to me.

China Pond is closing because their rent went up. Their rent went up because Cumberland Farms passed their Town of Milton tax increases on to their tenants. No surprises and no rumors there, just basic economics. The taxes are what economists call a “pass through” expense – they go right on through to the tenant. The Town raised the rent.

The Ray’s Marina restaurant project stalled on State regulatory issues regarding parking availability. Thank the State for its help. However, the Town of Milton tax rates definitely contributed to the financial pressure on those prior owners during the “great” recession. And it has been no picnic for the current owners either. The numbers are right there in Avitar. They are stalled by the State and the Town of Milton is bleeding them dry. Discouraging.

The Binker Brothers’ antique store is stalled on the Zoning Board of Adjustment’s (ZBA) interpretation of what constitutes “commercial” use. Factories, yes, quaint antique stores in renovated historical buildings, not so much. (It depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is).

I have no words. The meeting is posted by the Milton ZBA and the antique entrepreneurs have asked us to attend.

Evidently, we should all be there with bells on. We’ve been invited. Tonight at the Emma Ramsey Center, at 6:00 PM. That is the rumor anyway. Pitchforks optional.

References:

Binker Brothers Antiques. (2018). Binker Brothers Facebook. Retrieved from www.facebook.com/Binkerbrothers/

Milton NH Community News. (2018). Milton NH Community News Facebook Group. Retrieved from www.facebook.com/ourmiltonnews/

Our Milton Home. (2018). Our Milton Home Facebook Group. Retrieved fromwww.facebook.com/groups/OurMiltonHome/

Town of Milton. (2018). Assessment Data Review Online (Avitar). Retrieved from data.avitarassociates.com/logondirect.aspx?usr=milton&pwd=Milton

Town of Milton. (2018, August 17). Case2018-2 Request for Special Excpetion [Sic], Chris & Michelle Penta. Retrieved from www.miltonnh-us.com/uploads/zba_189_808339455.pdf

Town of Milton. (2018, September 10). BOS Meeting, September 10, 2018. Retrieved from youtu.be/PlwhI_Uz_rs?t=1673

Town of Milton, ZBA. (2018). Agenda. Retrieved from www.miltonnh-us.com/uploads/zba_189_2246368897.pdf